Corneal transplant in United Arab Emirates: Our Best Clinics and Costs 2024

Get Free Personalized Offer
820К+
patients have got assistance since 2014
50
countries
1,500
clinics
6K+
reviews
3K+
qualified doctors

Your Benefits and Guarantees with Bookimed

Direct Prices

Bookimed does not add extra charges for Corneal transplant prices. The rates come from the clinics' official price lists. You pay directly at the clinic for your Corneal transplant upon your arrival.

Verified Clinics & Doctors Only

Bookimed is committed to your safety. We only work with medical institutions that maintain high international standards in Corneal transplant and have the necessary licenses to serve international patients worldwide.

Free 24/7 Assistance

Bookimed offers free expert assistance. A personal medical coordinator supports you before, during, and after your treatment, solving any issues. You're never alone on your Corneal transplant journey.

Why we?

Your personal Bookimed medical coordinator

  • Supports you at every stage
  • Helps choose the right clinic and doctor
  • Ensures quick and convenient access to information

How Much Does Corneal transplant Cost in United Arab Emirates?

The price is provided on request
Request the price
The USA
Turkey
Mexico
Keratoplastyfrom $3000from $1000from $1150
Corneal transplantfrom $19500from $6500from $7475
Corneal ring implantation from $18750from $6250from $7187
Corneal Cross Linking (CCL) (One eye)from $4770from $1590from $1828

Corneal transplant Overview in United Arab Emirates

Takeaways
Related procedures & Costs
How it works
What to expect
Benefits
Payment
patients recommend -
85%
Surgery Time - 2 hours
Stay in the country - 7 days
Rehabilitation - 30 days
Anesthesia - Local anesthesia
Requests processed - 15215
Bookimed fees - $0

Video Stories from Bookimed Patients

Marina
"Bookimed did everything for me. I didn't have to worry about anything."
Procedure: Female check-up
Oksana
"I have fulfilled my dream. Finally, I won't cry about my hair anymore."
Procedure: Hair transplant
Roman
"Just 4 days in Turkey, and I'm already home with a new hair."
Procedure: FUE hair transplant
Clinic: Hair Clinic
Content meets the Bookimed Editorial Policy and is medically reviewed by
Fahad Mawlood
Author
Anna Leonova
Head of Content Marketing Team
Updated: 5/27/2022
The content accuracy and quality have been checked by Bookimed Medical Advisory Board

Our Corneal transplant Techniques: What Suits You Best?

When considering Corneal transplant, it’s important to understand the different techniques and which is best suited for you. Here’s a concise comparison of popular options:

Corneal Cross Linking (CCL) (One eye)

This procedure strengthens the cornea by using ultraviolet light and riboflavin drops to halt the progression of keratoconus.

Pros: Stabilizes keratoconus in 90% of cases without needing a corneal graft. Less invasive than keratoplasty with faster recovery.
Cons: May not improve vision significantly. Potential for temporary discomfort and light sensitivity post-procedure.
Effectiveness: 90% stabilization rate.
Duration: 1-2 hours.
Recovery: 1-2 weeks.
Best for: Early-stage keratoconus or corneal ectasia. Suitable for patients with less than 400 microns corneal thickness.

Keratoplasty

Keratoplasty involves replacing damaged corneal tissue with healthy donor corneal tissue to restore vision.

Pros: High success rate of about 90% for vision restoration. Effective for severe corneal diseases and injuries that other treatments cannot address.
Cons: Requires a donor match, which might take time. Potential risk of rejection and need for long-term medication.
Effectiveness: 90% success in achieving significant vision improvement.
Duration: 1-2 hours.
Recovery: 6-12 months for full recovery.
Best for: Severe corneal diseases, corneal scarring, and vision loss cases. Suitable for patients with significant corneal damage.

Corneal ring implantation

A minimally invasive procedure where small, crescent-shaped rings are inserted into the cornea to improve vision by reshaping it.

Pros: Minimally invasive with a quick recovery time. Effective in halting keratoconus progression in 85% of cases. No need for donor tissue.
Cons: Not suitable for severe cases with significant corneal thinning. Potential for ring displacement or glare in 5% of patients.
Effectiveness: Success rate of improving vision by at least 2 lines on the vision chart in 80% of patients.
Duration: 1-2 hours.
Recovery: 1-2 days.
Best for: Mild to moderate keratoconus and astigmatism. Suitable for patients not eligible for corneal cross-linking.