Data verified by Bookimed as of December 2025, based on patient requests and official quotes from 231 clinics worldwide. Median costs are based on real invoices (2024–2025) and updated monthly. Actual prices may vary.
Prof. Dr. Ufuk Ozkaya has performed 900 orthopedic procedures with expertise in complex knee replacements. Robotic-assisted MAKO surgery typically costs around $21,000 – covering the procedure, 5-day hospital stay with meals, companion accommodation, and transfers. The clinic offers classical knee replacement for about $14,500. Both packages include preoperative tests and interpreter services. Memorial Bahçelievler holds JCI and ISO accreditations in Turkey's first LEED Platinum certified hospital.
Dr. Kayhan Turan pioneered robotic knee replacements in Turkey, performing over 3,000 joint surgeries across his 27-year career. He trains surgeons globally as President of the Orthopedic Robotic Surgery Association. Robotic knee replacement at Turan Turan Health Group may cost around $11,000 using the NAVIO 7 system – typically covering the Smith & Nephew implant, five-day hospital stay with companion's meals, and all transfers. The clinic specializes solely in robotic joint replacement techniques.
Discover the Best Knee replacement Clinics in United States of America: 35 Verified Options and Prices
The Bookimed clinic ranking is based on data science algorithms, providing a trusted, transparent, and objective comparison. It takes into account patient demand, review scores (both positive and negative), the frequency of updates to treatment options and prices, response speed, and clinic certifications.
A certified medical writer with 10+ years of experience, developed Bookimed’s trusted content, backed by a Master’s in Philology and medical expert interviews worldwide.
General practitioner. Winner of 4 scientific awards. Served in Western Asia. Former Team Leader of a medical team supporting Arabic-speaking patients. Now responsible for data processing and medical content accuracy.
This page may feature information relating to various medical conditions, treatments, and healthcare services available in different countries. Please be advised that the content is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice or guidance. Please consult with your doctor or a qualified medical professional before starting or changing medical treatment.
Our Knee replacement Techniques: What Suits You Best?
When considering Knee replacement, it’s important to understand the different techniques and which is best suited for you. Here’s a concise comparison of popular options:
Knee Arthroscopy
A minimally invasive surgical procedure used to diagnose and treat problems in the knee joint by inserting a small camera and instruments through tiny incisions.
Pros: Offers quicker recovery times than open surgery, with fewer complications. Studies show up to 80% success in treating meniscal tears.
Cons: Limited to minor repairs and may not address severe arthritis. There's a 10-20% chance of needing further surgery.
Effectiveness: Effective in 70-90% of cases for relieving pain and improving function.
Duration: 1-2 hours
Recovery: 1-6 weeks
Best for: Meniscal tears, loose fragments, and mild to moderate cartilage damage.
Knee MAKOplasty
Knee MAKOplasty is a minimally invasive knee surgery using robotic assistance to ensure precise implant placement.
Pros: Provides more precision than traditional knee surgery, with a 90% success rate in pain reduction. Minimally invasive, leading to smaller incisions and less scarring.
Cons: Requires specialized equipment and training, which may not be available in all facilities. Longer learning curve for surgeons compared to traditional methods.
Effectiveness: 98% accuracy in implant positioning, enhancing joint function and longevity.
Duration: 2-3 hours
Recovery: 4-6 weeks
Best for: Patients with osteoarthritis affecting one or two knee compartments. Suitable for individuals seeking faster recovery.
Unicompartmental (partial) knee replacement
This procedure involves replacing only one compartment of the knee joint, preserving more of the patient's natural bone and ligaments.
Pros: Retains more natural knee function with 85% of patients reporting a more natural feel compared to total knee replacement. Smaller incision results in quicker recovery.
Cons: Not suitable for patients with severe arthritis affecting multiple compartments. Revision rate is higher, with about 10% needing further surgery within 10 years.
Effectiveness: 10-year survival rate is approximately 85%.
Duration: 1-2 hours.
Recovery: 3-6 months.
Best for: Patients with arthritis confined to a single knee compartment. Ideal for those under 60 years old.